Journal of
Marketing Development and Competitiveness
Scholar Gateway
Abstracts prior to volume 5(1) have been archived!
Issue 5(1), October 2010 -- Paper AbstractsGirard (p. 9-22)
Cooper (p. 23-32)Kunz-Osborne (p. 33-41)Coulmas-Law (p.42-46)Stasio (p. 47-56)Albert-Valette-Florence (p.57-63)Zhang-Rauch (p. 64-70)Alam-Yasin (p. 71-78)Mattare-Monahan-Shah (p. 79-94)Nonis-Hudson-Hunt (p. 95-106) 
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION THEORY AND PRACTICE
Comparing Elephants and Bananas in Educational Achievements: What Do Data Reveal?
Author(s): Tihomira Trifonova
Citation: Tihomira Trifonova, (2020) "Comparing Elephants and Bananas in Educational Achievements: What Do Data Reveal?," Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, Vol. 20, ss. 16, pp. 109-118
Article Type: Research paper
Publisher: North American Business Press
Abstract:
The problem of functional illiteracy emerged in the Bulgarian society when the results of the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA test) were announced. Until then it was not aware of such a deficit. The national external assessment of students’ educational achievements did not give any signs of a pervasive systemic deficit in the Bulgarian education. A comparison of the two tests’ scores however reveals a considerable discrepancy. Looking at the tests’ metadata, it becomes obvious the comparison is between elephants and bananas and that explains the inconsistency. This paper compares the two datasets of students’ scores and the tests’ measuring methodologies. It further concludes that the national system fails to adapt to the needs of a changing society. However, it has an important ally in the face of the civil society, which provides its own resources to satisfy learning needs.
